"This isn't really a convention, This is really an infomercial. And every night we'll have a different infomercial and people view it with a certain level of cynicism"

In this quote, Susan Estrich uses an important point of view on the nature of modern-day conventions, most likely describing political party conventions, highlighting their transformation from platforms for real political discourse into managed eyeglasses resembling business paid announcements. An infomercial, by definition, is a television program that promotes an item in a helpful and allegedly objective method, yet its main objective is to encourage audiences to buy. By drawing this parallel, Estrich implies that conventions have shifted their focus from substantive debate and authentic interaction with the public to highly scripted discussions focused on persuasion rather than knowledge.

The expression "This isn't truly a convention" suggests disillusionment with the present state of such events. Generally, conventions were essential to political procedures, working as locations for debates, decision-making, and policy solution. Nevertheless, Estrich indicates this original function has actually been overshadowed by theatrics designed to influence public understanding. The statement "This is actually an infomercial" highlights the idea that conventions are now mainly marketing workouts, presenting sleek narratives instead of engaging with substantive political issues.

The reference of having "a different paid announcement" every night highlights the segmented and tactical approach to these occasions, where each evening might concentrate on a particular style or group, aiming to take full advantage of appeal and effect. Estrich keeps in mind that "people see it with a particular level of cynicism", suggesting that the public is progressively aware of the performative nature of these conventions and for that reason approaches them with apprehension, recognizing the managed nature of the presentations and questioning their credibility.

Estrich's review is a commentary on the commercialization of political discourse, where the line in between real political engagement and a marketing project is progressively blurred. This reflects more comprehensive issues about how political interaction often prioritizes optics over compound, potentially weakening democratic processes by prioritizing persuasion over real engagement with diverse concepts and voices. Her declaration invites a reflection on how modern-day political occasions may regain their authenticity and much better serve the democratic procedure by cultivating genuine dialogue and diversity of thought.