"This program has been successful in detecting and preventing attacks inside the United States"
About this Quote
Success, in Michael Hayden's hands, is a strategically bland word with sharp edges. "This program has been successful in detecting and preventing attacks inside the United States" isn't just a claim; it's a preemptive permission slip. Hayden, a former NSA and CIA director speaking from the post-9/11 security state, reaches for the language of management reporting: program, successful, detecting, preventing. The bureaucrat's cadence is the point. It sanitizes an argument about extraordinary power into something that sounds like quarterly metrics.
The intent is twofold: reassure a frightened public and box out skeptical lawmakers and judges. By asserting efficacy, Hayden shifts the debate away from legality and oversight and toward outcomes. If it "prevents attacks", who wants to be the person arguing for fewer tools? The sentence quietly drafts the listener into complicity: accept the program, or accept the risk.
Subtext does the heavier lifting. "Successful" is unquantified, which is a feature, not a bug. It invites the audience to supply their own imagined catastrophe and credit the program for averting it, while withholding the evidence that would allow real scrutiny. "Inside the United States" also signals a controversial crossing: intelligence practices built for foreign threats applied domestically. That's a constitutional pressure point, smoothed over by the soothing promise of protection.
In the broader context of warrantless surveillance and secret legal interpretations, Hayden's line functions as narrative air cover. It's not a proof; it's a political technology, designed to make secrecy feel like safety and accountability feel like a luxury.
The intent is twofold: reassure a frightened public and box out skeptical lawmakers and judges. By asserting efficacy, Hayden shifts the debate away from legality and oversight and toward outcomes. If it "prevents attacks", who wants to be the person arguing for fewer tools? The sentence quietly drafts the listener into complicity: accept the program, or accept the risk.
Subtext does the heavier lifting. "Successful" is unquantified, which is a feature, not a bug. It invites the audience to supply their own imagined catastrophe and credit the program for averting it, while withholding the evidence that would allow real scrutiny. "Inside the United States" also signals a controversial crossing: intelligence practices built for foreign threats applied domestically. That's a constitutional pressure point, smoothed over by the soothing promise of protection.
In the broader context of warrantless surveillance and secret legal interpretations, Hayden's line functions as narrative air cover. It's not a proof; it's a political technology, designed to make secrecy feel like safety and accountability feel like a luxury.
Quote Details
| Topic | Privacy & Cybersecurity |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List
