"To some lawyers, all facts are created equal"
About this Quote
Frankfurter’s line lands like a dry judicial aside, but it’s really an indictment: the courtroom can turn reality into a buffet where every item is priced the same. “To some lawyers” is the tell. He’s not attacking the profession wholesale; he’s carving out a recognizable type - the advocate who treats facts as interchangeable tokens, valuable not for their truthfulness or moral weight but for their usefulness in a brief. The sting is in the parody of American civic scripture. By borrowing the cadence of “all men are created equal,” he suggests a warped legal egalitarianism: not equality under law, but equality of evidentiary scraps under rhetorical pressure.
The subtext is epistemological. Frankfurter is warning that legal reasoning can mimic the form of rationality while quietly severing it from the hierarchy that actual events demand. Some facts are central; some are peripheral; some are misleading without context. To flatten them is to perform neutrality while practicing manipulation. It’s also a jab at a strain of lawyering that confuses procedural fairness with intellectual honesty - as if giving every “fact” equal airtime is the same thing as justice.
Context matters: Frankfurter, a Supreme Court Justice associated with judicial restraint and deep respect for institutions, watched modern litigation professionalize into a contest of narrative engineering. His skepticism isn’t anti-law; it’s pro-judgment. The line defends discernment as a civic virtue, and it quietly asks whether our adversarial system rewards truth-finding or merely rewards the best architect of equivalences.
The subtext is epistemological. Frankfurter is warning that legal reasoning can mimic the form of rationality while quietly severing it from the hierarchy that actual events demand. Some facts are central; some are peripheral; some are misleading without context. To flatten them is to perform neutrality while practicing manipulation. It’s also a jab at a strain of lawyering that confuses procedural fairness with intellectual honesty - as if giving every “fact” equal airtime is the same thing as justice.
Context matters: Frankfurter, a Supreme Court Justice associated with judicial restraint and deep respect for institutions, watched modern litigation professionalize into a contest of narrative engineering. His skepticism isn’t anti-law; it’s pro-judgment. The line defends discernment as a civic virtue, and it quietly asks whether our adversarial system rewards truth-finding or merely rewards the best architect of equivalences.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|
More Quotes by Felix
Add to List





