"Totalitarianism is feudalism in the twelfth century sense of the word"

Barbara Amiel's quote, "Totalitarianism is feudalism in the twelfth century sense of the word", draws an intriguing parallel in between 2 historical and political systems commonly understood to be distinct. By comparing totalitarianism to feudalism, Amiel invites us to examine the underlying resemblances in their structures and operations, in spite of the shallow differences in historical context and technology.

Feudalism, particularly in the twelfth century, was characterized by a rigid hierarchical structure based on land ownership and service. Power was decentralized, with local lords wielding significant authority over their estates, while the king preserved nominal control over the whole world. This system stimulated a society where individuals' roles and statuses were largely established, promoting a culture of loyalty and obedience to authority figures.

Totalitarianism, by contrast, is a twentieth-century phenomenon identified by centralization of power in a single celebration or leader. It involves making use of modern innovation and ideology to control nearly all elements of life, from politics and education to individual beliefs and private life. Unlike feudalism's decentralized nature, totalitarian routines are generally highly centralized, with little tolerance for dissent or autonomy.

Regardless of these differences, Amiel's contrast suggests that both systems share fundamental resemblances in terms of control and hierarchy. In totalitarian systems, as in feudal societies, individual autonomy is severely limited. The state, like the feudal lord, determines the roles and tasks of people, typically requiring complete commitment and subordination. Both systems depend on a mix of coercion and consent, utilizing power structures to maintain control over the population.

Additionally, both feudal and totalitarian systems can be seen as reactionary reactions to condition. Feudalism became a way to bring back order in post-Roman Europe, while totalitarian programs often rise in reaction to viewed turmoil or instability.

In essence, Amiel's quote challenges us to see beyond the temporal and technological distinctions in between these 2 systems, highlighting how both reflect humanity's continuous battle with power, control, and flexibility.