"Two children of same cruel parent look at one another and see in each other the image of the cruel parent or the image of their past oppressor. This is very much the case between Jew and Arab: It's a conflict between two victims"

Amos Oz, in this quote, uses a poignant metaphor to describe the complex and stuffed relationship between Jews and Arabs, specifically in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian dispute. By referring to them as "2 children of same vicious moms and dad", Oz suggests that both groups have suffered under similar oppressions or hardships historically. The "harsh moms and dad" can be analyzed as the broader forces of history and colonization that have actually subjected both groups to suffering, challenge, and displacement. This shared history of trauma has actually left deep-rooted scars, which affect how they view each other.

When Oz describes each group seeing "the image of the terrible moms and dad or the image of their past oppressor" in the other, he highlights the cycle of forecast and skepticism that perpetuates dispute. Each side, bearing the weight of previous victimization, might automatically view the other through the lens of their historic suffering. This is not simply about recognizing shared trauma, but about how that trauma manifests as animosity. Instead of seeing the commonality in their grief, each sees the reflection of what has hurt them.

By asserting that it is "a conflict in between two victims", Oz reframes a typical narrative of aggressor versus oppressed. He posits that both Jews and Arabs-- specifically Israelis and Palestinians-- carry the burden of victimhood. This point of view doesn't equate their experiences however acknowledges the deep wounds and legacies that notify each side's actions and fears.

Oz's insight welcomes reflection on the nature of victimhood and its power to form identities and conflicts. It suggests that recognition of shared suffering could, maybe, be a path towards compassion and reconciliation. Comprehending this might be vital in discovering a resolution, as it requires each side to acknowledge not just its own pain but also the discomfort of the other, fostering a dialogue defined by empathy instead of enmity.