"We can have tax cuts, but when we have tax cuts and do not have a surplus, the amount of the tax cut goes straight to the bottom line, adds to the deficit, and the deficit adds to the national debt, and sooner or later, the debt has to be paid"
About this Quote
Spratt is doing something unfashionable in American politics: treating arithmetic like a moral argument. The line is built like a relay race of consequences-tax cuts to deficit to debt to repayment-so the listener can’t hide in the comforting fog of “growth will handle it.” Each clause tightens the vise. By the time he lands on “sooner or later,” the policy dispute has been recast as an inevitability, almost a law of physics, not a partisan preference.
The specific intent is to puncture the fantasy that tax cuts are costless when the books are already in the red. Notice the blunt corporate phrasing “goes straight to the bottom line,” a deliberate borrowing from business talk that conservative audiences are trained to trust. Spratt turns that language against the tax-cut script: if you like balance sheets, here’s the balance sheet.
The subtext is about political honesty and temporal cheating. “Tax cuts” are immediate and tangible; “debt has to be paid” is delayed and abstract. Spratt drags the delayed part into the present tense, implying that elected officials are selling voters a discount today and invoicing their kids tomorrow. He also sidesteps the more ideological fight-over the size of government-by focusing on sequencing: you can cut taxes, but only if you’ve banked a surplus or paired it with cuts elsewhere.
Contextually, this is late-20th/early-21st century fiscal combat: Democrats positioning themselves as the party of pay-fors, pushing back on the post-Reagan habit of deficit-financed tax relief. It’s not soaring rhetoric; it’s a warning label.
The specific intent is to puncture the fantasy that tax cuts are costless when the books are already in the red. Notice the blunt corporate phrasing “goes straight to the bottom line,” a deliberate borrowing from business talk that conservative audiences are trained to trust. Spratt turns that language against the tax-cut script: if you like balance sheets, here’s the balance sheet.
The subtext is about political honesty and temporal cheating. “Tax cuts” are immediate and tangible; “debt has to be paid” is delayed and abstract. Spratt drags the delayed part into the present tense, implying that elected officials are selling voters a discount today and invoicing their kids tomorrow. He also sidesteps the more ideological fight-over the size of government-by focusing on sequencing: you can cut taxes, but only if you’ve banked a surplus or paired it with cuts elsewhere.
Contextually, this is late-20th/early-21st century fiscal combat: Democrats positioning themselves as the party of pay-fors, pushing back on the post-Reagan habit of deficit-financed tax relief. It’s not soaring rhetoric; it’s a warning label.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List
