"We cannot afford idleness, waste or inefficiency"
About this Quote
We cannot afford idleness, waste or inefficiency condenses a statesmanlike ethic of scarcity and responsibility. The verb afford is literal as much as moral: a small, newly independent country with limited capital and fragile markets cannot squander labor, materials, or time. Idleness invokes both unemployment and a longstanding moral vocabulary in Irish public life that treated slackness as a social wrong. Waste speaks to the hoarding, leakage, and casual misuse of scarce goods that marked the 1930s and 1940s. Inefficiency targets the slow gears of administration, industry, and agriculture that de Valera believed had to be tightened if Ireland were to be truly sovereign.
The historical backdrop sharpens the line. De Valera led during the Economic War with Britain in the 1930s, when tariffs and a collapse in cattle exports squeezed the economy, and during the Emergency of World War II, when neutrality brought severe shortages of fuel, fertilizers, and imports. Policy pushed toward self-sufficiency: expanding tillage, mobilizing turf cutting, rationing, and urging communities to produce more with fewer inputs. Under those constraints, every idle hand was a lost harvest, every wasted pound a dent in fragile currency reserves, and every inefficient process a national vulnerability.
The sentence also reflects his ideological blend of national self-reliance, Catholic social teaching, and corporatist planning. It demands discipline not only from individuals but from institutions: civil service reform, coordinated production, and careful stewardship. Yet the severity of the injunction carries an enduring tension. Pressed too hard, it can stigmatize the unemployed or rationalize coercive productivity drives; tempered with investment in education, infrastructure, and fair protections, it becomes a call to dignified work and prudent governance.
As a piece of rhetoric, the tricolonic cadence turns economic prudence into a civic creed. The appeal is both practical and aspirational: a reminder that sovereignty is not merely constitutional but operational, earned day by day through the careful conversion of effort into collective well-being.
The historical backdrop sharpens the line. De Valera led during the Economic War with Britain in the 1930s, when tariffs and a collapse in cattle exports squeezed the economy, and during the Emergency of World War II, when neutrality brought severe shortages of fuel, fertilizers, and imports. Policy pushed toward self-sufficiency: expanding tillage, mobilizing turf cutting, rationing, and urging communities to produce more with fewer inputs. Under those constraints, every idle hand was a lost harvest, every wasted pound a dent in fragile currency reserves, and every inefficient process a national vulnerability.
The sentence also reflects his ideological blend of national self-reliance, Catholic social teaching, and corporatist planning. It demands discipline not only from individuals but from institutions: civil service reform, coordinated production, and careful stewardship. Yet the severity of the injunction carries an enduring tension. Pressed too hard, it can stigmatize the unemployed or rationalize coercive productivity drives; tempered with investment in education, infrastructure, and fair protections, it becomes a call to dignified work and prudent governance.
As a piece of rhetoric, the tricolonic cadence turns economic prudence into a civic creed. The appeal is both practical and aspirational: a reminder that sovereignty is not merely constitutional but operational, earned day by day through the careful conversion of effort into collective well-being.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work Ethic |
|---|
More Quotes by Eamon
Add to List
