"We have a couple of dogs, but I wouldn't describe myself as an animal person"
About this Quote
Pamela Stephenson’s statement expresses a nuanced attitude toward animals and pet ownership. She acknowledges having a couple of dogs, suggesting there is a shared domestic life with animals, yet she resists the automatic label of being "an animal person". This highlights that simply having pets does not always equate to a deep or innate affection for animals in general. Her comment draws attention to the complex distinction between enjoying certain animals, or pet ownership as a routine or familial obligation, and genuinely identifying as someone deeply emotionally invested in animal companionship or advocacy.
Many people grow up or live in households with pets as part of family tradition, partnership compromises, or because of their children's wishes. For some, pets fit into their lives naturally without the relationship moving into passionate affection or enduring emotional reliance. Stephenson’s perspective suggests a pragmatic or perhaps reserved approach. She may appreciate or care for her pets but doesn’t find a broader passion for animals or see her identity as revolving around them.
Her choice of words underscores the importance of self-definition and not succumbing to societal pressure to adopt a particular identity just because of one's circumstances. Owning dogs, for her, is perhaps akin to enjoying their company or fulfilling familial roles, but it doesn't define her overall personality or lifestyle choices.
Additionally, the statement subtly challenges stereotypes about pet owners. Society often romanticizes owning pets, equating it with being animal-loving by default. Stephenson resists this narrative, demonstrating self-awareness and perhaps a little humor in separating the practical aspects of sharing a home with dogs from a personality trait or lifestyle label. Her words invite consideration of how easily people can be categorized based on surface-level facets of their lives, while true affinity or identity can be much more complex and individualistic.
More details
About the Author