"We have a serious structural deficit problem. And it needs to be addressed. The president is trying to address it through reforms of Social Security, but the problem is there with other entitlement programs like Medicare and Medicaid"
About this Quote
John W. Snow warns about a deficit that is not a temporary byproduct of the business cycle but a built-in mismatch between what the government promises and what its tax system raises. As Treasury Secretary under President George W. Bush, he was championing the administration’s push to overhaul Social Security in the mid-2000s, especially during the 2005 effort to introduce personal retirement accounts. Yet his words also concede that the most powerful fiscal pressures lie in Medicare and Medicaid, where costs are propelled by an aging population and medical inflation that outpaces overall economic growth.
The context matters. After late-1990s surpluses, the U.S. reentered deficit territory in the early 2000s, influenced by tax cuts, recession, and new spending, including the Medicare prescription drug benefit (Part D). Calling the problem “structural” signals that stronger growth alone cannot close the gap; there are long-term commitments rising faster than revenues. Social Security faces a projected shortfall as baby boomers retire, but its financing imbalance is relatively contained and can be addressed with incremental changes like adjusting benefits, taxes, or retirement ages. Medicare and Medicaid, however, tie the government’s obligations to the underlying cost of health care, making their growth trajectory the dominant driver of future deficits.
Snow’s framing tries to build support for entitlement reform while widening the lens beyond Social Security. It also reflects a broader policy debate: whether sustainability requires chiefly spending reforms, revenue changes, or both. Critics of the Bush-era approach argued that tax cuts and the new drug benefit deepened the structural gap, while bipartisan commissions later converged on the view that health-care cost growth is the central fiscal challenge.
The underlying message is urgency and scope. Stabilizing the nation’s finances means confronting demography and health costs head-on, accepting politically difficult trade-offs, and acting before compounding trends narrow the options and raise the eventual price of reform.
The context matters. After late-1990s surpluses, the U.S. reentered deficit territory in the early 2000s, influenced by tax cuts, recession, and new spending, including the Medicare prescription drug benefit (Part D). Calling the problem “structural” signals that stronger growth alone cannot close the gap; there are long-term commitments rising faster than revenues. Social Security faces a projected shortfall as baby boomers retire, but its financing imbalance is relatively contained and can be addressed with incremental changes like adjusting benefits, taxes, or retirement ages. Medicare and Medicaid, however, tie the government’s obligations to the underlying cost of health care, making their growth trajectory the dominant driver of future deficits.
Snow’s framing tries to build support for entitlement reform while widening the lens beyond Social Security. It also reflects a broader policy debate: whether sustainability requires chiefly spending reforms, revenue changes, or both. Critics of the Bush-era approach argued that tax cuts and the new drug benefit deepened the structural gap, while bipartisan commissions later converged on the view that health-care cost growth is the central fiscal challenge.
The underlying message is urgency and scope. Stabilizing the nation’s finances means confronting demography and health costs head-on, accepting politically difficult trade-offs, and acting before compounding trends narrow the options and raise the eventual price of reform.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List
