"We need to be pro-science; we have to go back to science"
About this Quote
The repetition - "pro-science" and then "back to science" - carries a double jab. First, "pro-science" sounds like a political identity, as if evidence is just another team jersey. Then "go back" corrects that framing: science isn’t a tribe, it’s a method. The subtext is that we’ve treated facts as negotiable, and the results are measurable: public health failures, climate denial, policy made for cable segments instead of consequences.
Franken’s comedic background matters because he knows the audience he’s addressing: people exhausted by culture-war theater but still susceptible to it. He uses the language of nostalgia and common sense to make epistemology feel non-elite. There’s also an implicit rebuke to leaders who perform certainty while dismissing expertise. "Back to science" is a demand to trade swagger for humility - to admit we don’t know, test it, and live with what the data says, even when it’s inconvenient.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Franken, Al. (2026, January 17). We need to be pro-science; we have to go back to science. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-need-to-be-pro-science-we-have-to-go-back-to-29554/
Chicago Style
Franken, Al. "We need to be pro-science; we have to go back to science." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-need-to-be-pro-science-we-have-to-go-back-to-29554/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"We need to be pro-science; we have to go back to science." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-need-to-be-pro-science-we-have-to-go-back-to-29554/. Accessed 13 Feb. 2026.







