"We need to focus on the development of innovation and high technology, as this is the key to the future success of our country"
About this Quote
Technocratic optimism is doing heavy lifting here, and that is the point. Medvedev’s line wraps a political promise in the clean, non-ideological language of “innovation” and “high technology,” terms that sound like destiny rather than policy. It’s a future-facing pitch designed to reassure: the country won’t be trapped in old models, it will upgrade. As rhetoric, it flatters the listener with the implication that modernity is a choice away, available through focus and willpower.
The subtext is less about gadgets than about legitimacy. Russia’s post-Soviet bargain has often rested on stability and resource wealth; “high technology” hints at a different social contract, one that can claim national greatness through engineering, startups, and global competitiveness rather than oil, security services, or nostalgia. It also positions the state as an architect of progress, not merely a manager of decline. “We need to focus” signals urgency but also central control: innovation is presented as a national project to be directed, not a messy ecosystem that thrives on dissent, risk, and independent institutions.
Context sharpens the stakes. Medvedev’s presidency was widely read as the modernizing interlude inside a system still defined by Putin’s power vertical. So the line functions as both aspiration and alibi: if the future is “technology,” then political conflict can be reframed as a distraction from modernization. It’s a sleek slogan that implicitly asks citizens to trade demands for openness for a promise of upgrades. The irony is structural: innovation is invoked as the key, while the lock remains the broader governance model.
The subtext is less about gadgets than about legitimacy. Russia’s post-Soviet bargain has often rested on stability and resource wealth; “high technology” hints at a different social contract, one that can claim national greatness through engineering, startups, and global competitiveness rather than oil, security services, or nostalgia. It also positions the state as an architect of progress, not merely a manager of decline. “We need to focus” signals urgency but also central control: innovation is presented as a national project to be directed, not a messy ecosystem that thrives on dissent, risk, and independent institutions.
Context sharpens the stakes. Medvedev’s presidency was widely read as the modernizing interlude inside a system still defined by Putin’s power vertical. So the line functions as both aspiration and alibi: if the future is “technology,” then political conflict can be reframed as a distraction from modernization. It’s a sleek slogan that implicitly asks citizens to trade demands for openness for a promise of upgrades. The irony is structural: innovation is invoked as the key, while the lock remains the broader governance model.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Dmitry
Add to List
