"We strain to tell Americans and aliens in this country that there's nothing unique about America, nothing unique about American civilization, nothing that requires their allegiance, nothing of great value that they should sacrifice for"
About this Quote
Tom Tancredo argues that cultural and political institutions are eroding the idea of American exceptionalism and, by doing so, undermining the bonds that hold a nation together. The phrasing suggests a deliberate effort: we strain to tell Americans and aliens that nothing about the country is unique, nothing warrants allegiance, nothing merits sacrifice. The repetition of nothing functions as a rhetorical hammer, building a sense of alarm over a vacuum where a shared civic creed ought to be.
A Colorado congressman known for hardline immigration policies and advocacy of assimilation, Tancredo often linked border enforcement to questions of cultural cohesion. During the mid-2000s debates over immigration reform, bilingual education, and multicultural curricula, he positioned himself against what he saw as relativism from elites in academia, media, and government. The use of the legal term aliens underscores his focus on national membership and the boundaries of belonging.
Beneath the polemic sits a clear thesis: nations require a story of uniqueness and value to demand loyalty and sacrifice, especially from newcomers. Without it, the argument goes, the social glue thins; military service, civic duty, and the hard work of assimilation weaken. The claim also frames criticism of American history and power as a denial of worth, collapsing nuance into negation.
There is both force and fragility in the charge. It channels a longstanding American tradition of exceptionalism, appealing to pride and shared purpose. Yet it risks a straw man: many who challenge triumphalist narratives seek a more inclusive story, not a declaration that America has no value. The tension he names is real, though: between a unifying civic identity and a pluralistic reckoning with history. Tancredo presses for the former, warning that without a compelling national ideal, allegiance and sacrifice fade; his critics worry that a singular ideal can silence complexity and exclude those at the margins.
A Colorado congressman known for hardline immigration policies and advocacy of assimilation, Tancredo often linked border enforcement to questions of cultural cohesion. During the mid-2000s debates over immigration reform, bilingual education, and multicultural curricula, he positioned himself against what he saw as relativism from elites in academia, media, and government. The use of the legal term aliens underscores his focus on national membership and the boundaries of belonging.
Beneath the polemic sits a clear thesis: nations require a story of uniqueness and value to demand loyalty and sacrifice, especially from newcomers. Without it, the argument goes, the social glue thins; military service, civic duty, and the hard work of assimilation weaken. The claim also frames criticism of American history and power as a denial of worth, collapsing nuance into negation.
There is both force and fragility in the charge. It channels a longstanding American tradition of exceptionalism, appealing to pride and shared purpose. Yet it risks a straw man: many who challenge triumphalist narratives seek a more inclusive story, not a declaration that America has no value. The tension he names is real, though: between a unifying civic identity and a pluralistic reckoning with history. Tancredo presses for the former, warning that without a compelling national ideal, allegiance and sacrifice fade; his critics worry that a singular ideal can silence complexity and exclude those at the margins.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List


