"We wanted to do a sequel with Jim and Jeff. They said that the word was that Jim didn't want to do any sequels. We approached him and he said he would do it, but not until next year. New Line said it was too long to wait"

Bobby Farrelly is reflecting on the behind-the-scenes negotiations that took place regarding the potential for a sequel involving the actors Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels. The statement reveals the complexity and often-complicated nature of film production, particularly when it comes to high-profile sequels. It emphasizes the importance of timing, actor availability, and the often competing priorities of studios and artists.

Farrelly recounts that initially, there was a perception that Jim Carrey was reluctant to engage in sequels, suggesting perhaps an industry reputation or personal stance Carrey held at the time. This perception impacted the early stages of development, possibly causing hesitation or delays. However, upon direct communication with Carrey, it was clarified that he was open to reprising his role, but not immediately. Carrey expressed a willingness, but stipulated a timeline, he would only be available the following year.

The willingness of both Carrey and Daniels to consider the project highlights the actors' interest in their iconic roles, yet also underscores how their individual schedules and priorities must align with a project's production timeline. At the same time, the studio, New Line Cinema, had its own constraints and expectations. The studio’s decision that waiting a full year was "too long" demonstrates the fast-paced, opportunistic mindset that often drives major studios. They are sensitive to timing, audience attention, market trends, and profit probabilities, all of which can be negatively impacted by delays. The risk includes waning public interest or the possibility that another competing film might seize the cultural moment instead.

As a result, Farrelly’s account exposes the interplay between creative intentions and business realities, where even if core participants are interested, logistical and strategic considerations might cause a project to stall or be temporarily abandoned. The quote sheds light on how the ambitions and hesitations of artists, combined with the pragmatic urgency of studios, shape the fate of potential films.