"We were right about the slush fund. But Sloan did not testify about it to the Grand Jury"
About this Quote
As an editor forged in the Watergate era, Bradlee understood that power rarely loses because journalists are correct; it loses when institutions are forced to acknowledge facts on the official stage. The subtext is both frustration and discipline. He’s warning against a seductive newsroom narrative where accuracy equals impact. If a key witness never says the crucial thing under oath, the legal system can’t use it, prosecutors can’t build on it, and the public story remains vulnerable to the most corrosive defense of all: prove it.
The line also hints at the ethical minefield editors live in: the tension between what you know and what can be demonstrated. "Slush fund" signals the ugly mechanics of corruption, while the Grand Jury represents the gatekeeping machinery of legitimacy. Bradlee is not romanticizing journalism here; he’s acknowledging its limits. The remark reads like a postmortem note to staff: our reporting can be solid and still fail to move the levers of consequence, because the fight isn’t just over facts - it’s over where, and by whom, those facts are allowed to count.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Bradlee, Ben. (2026, January 17). We were right about the slush fund. But Sloan did not testify about it to the Grand Jury. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-were-right-about-the-slush-fund-but-sloan-did-40861/
Chicago Style
Bradlee, Ben. "We were right about the slush fund. But Sloan did not testify about it to the Grand Jury." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-were-right-about-the-slush-fund-but-sloan-did-40861/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"We were right about the slush fund. But Sloan did not testify about it to the Grand Jury." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-were-right-about-the-slush-fund-but-sloan-did-40861/. Accessed 22 Feb. 2026.




