"We will never be authentically angry or authentically fair while we are trying to be both at once"

The quote by Ray Blanton, "We will never be authentically angry or authentically fair while we are trying to be both simultaneously," speaks to the inherent conflict in between feelings and neutrality. Anger is a powerful feeling that can cloud judgment and lead to spontaneous actions, often pressing individuals towards extreme positions. On the other hand, fairness needs impartiality, balance, and a lack of predisposition to evaluate situations objectively and equitably.

Blanton suggests that these two states are challenging to reconcile all at once. Authentic anger is raw and often reactive, driven by viewed oppressions or misbehaviors. It can be a powerful incentive for change if directed correctly. However, when one is authentically upset, keeping fairness becomes difficult since anger can bypass the capacity for objective analysis and understanding. The mind ends up being consumed with emotion, and in those minutes, fairness-- needing a calm and reasoned assessment of facts-- can be jeopardized.

Conversely, being authentically fair demands a degree of emotional detachment. It requires stepping back from personal feelings and desires to see the more comprehensive picture and understand several viewpoints. When striving for fairness, individual emotions like anger need to be set aside to achieve unbiased resolutions.

Blanton's statement highlights a typical human struggle: the obstacle to manage our feelings while aiming for justice. It suggests the need for balance between feeling and thinking. One must acknowledge the validity and constraints of their psychological responses while concurrently striving for reasonable services. In practice, this indicates enabling oneself to experience anger however not letting it dominate decisions. It requires cultivating self-awareness and psychological intelligence to acknowledge our feelings without letting them determine our actions.

Ultimately, the quote underscores the complexity of human emotions and decision-making, advising us that credibility in either realm frequently requires embracing their differences and finding ways to navigate in between them efficiently.