"Well, I think that we have to continue to fight for what we believe"
About this Quote
A line like this is built to sound inevitable, not specific. Roy Moore’s “we have to continue to fight for what we believe” borrows the language of moral urgency while carefully avoiding the burden of naming the actual belief, the stakes, or the costs. That vagueness is the point: it turns politics into a posture. “We” recruits a team; “have to” frames the struggle as duty rather than choice; “continue” implies an ongoing siege, a righteous minority under pressure. It’s less an argument than a mobilization cue.
Coming from a judge, the phrasing carries extra charge. Judges are supposed to be custodians of procedure and precedent, not commanders in a culture war. Moore’s career has repeatedly blurred that line, casting legal disputes as spiritual combat and institutional resistance as persecution. In that context, “fight” doesn’t just mean vote or litigate; it signals defiance of constraints that would normally discipline a public official’s power: court orders, ethical norms, even the idea that the law can overrule personal conviction.
The subtext is grievance dressed as virtue. If you’re already on Moore’s side, the quote validates a sense of embattled identity: you’re not losing ground, you’re holding the line. If you’re not, it’s a warning that compromise is off the table because the conflict has been upgraded from policy to belief. That’s why the sentence works: it’s emotionally adhesive, rhetorically portable, and strategically noncommittal, letting “what we believe” become whatever the audience needs it to be.
Coming from a judge, the phrasing carries extra charge. Judges are supposed to be custodians of procedure and precedent, not commanders in a culture war. Moore’s career has repeatedly blurred that line, casting legal disputes as spiritual combat and institutional resistance as persecution. In that context, “fight” doesn’t just mean vote or litigate; it signals defiance of constraints that would normally discipline a public official’s power: court orders, ethical norms, even the idea that the law can overrule personal conviction.
The subtext is grievance dressed as virtue. If you’re already on Moore’s side, the quote validates a sense of embattled identity: you’re not losing ground, you’re holding the line. If you’re not, it’s a warning that compromise is off the table because the conflict has been upgraded from policy to belief. That’s why the sentence works: it’s emotionally adhesive, rhetorically portable, and strategically noncommittal, letting “what we believe” become whatever the audience needs it to be.
Quote Details
| Topic | Never Give Up |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Roy
Add to List






