"Well, I use the word Satanist, but I don't know if I ever really considered myself as somebody who's into Satan"

Boyd Rice's quote, "Well, I utilize the word Satanist, but I do not understand if I ever actually considered myself as somebody who's into Satan", shows a nuanced and perhaps intriguing position on the label of 'Satanist.' The juxtaposition of labeling oneself with a term frequently associated with particular ideologies and practices, while concurrently expressing uncertainty towards its standard connotations, welcomes an expedition of identity and importance.

Rice might be recommending that his use of the term "Satanist" is more symbolic or philosophical instead of actual. Many people who self-identify as Satanists do not necessarily praise and even think in Satan as a deity. Instead, they may accept the term as a representation of rebellion against traditional spiritual standards, authority, and ethical absolutism. In this sense, Satan becomes a metaphor for individualism, nonconformity, and personal empowerment.

Rice's uncertainty may also indicate a more comprehensive critique of labels and identities. By stating he doesn't consider himself "someone who enjoys Satan", Rice distances himself from the religious or cult-like aspects that might be connected with Satanism. This might imply a rejection of dogma and an emphasis on personal analysis, aligning with specific analyses of Satanism that prioritize individual freedom over doctrinal adherence.

Additionally, the quote may be a commentary on the sensationalism and misconception surrounding Satanism. By using the term without subscribing to a belief in Satan, Rice might be highlighting how outsiders often mischaracterize subcultures based on their own preconceptions and fears.

In general, Rice's declaration challenges the listener to reassess conventional understandings of religious and cultural labels. It highlights the complexity of self-identification and the ways in which individuals browse and redefine the signs and terms that society frequently takes at face value. This approach encourages a deeper reflection on the fluid nature of belief and identity.