"Well, I'm telling them two things. One is that, look, this is going to be something when the American people realize - once it's passed - that, A, it does take care of preexisting conditions; B, you're insurance rates aren't going to skyrocket; C, the insurance companies aren't going to be running the show like they were before; D, you're going to be in a position where you can keep your insurance that you have. That once the American public realizes that, you're going to get a reward for this. They're going to be rewarded"
About this Quote
Joe Biden is making a case to nervous lawmakers during the heated push to pass the Affordable Care Act around 2009-2010. He lays out a political bet: pass the reform, let people experience its protections, and voters will ultimately reward you. He underscores the provisions Democratic leaders believed would resonate once implemented: coverage regardless of preexisting conditions, constraints on insurer power, stability in premiums, and continuity for people satisfied with their plans.
The appeal is both policy and politics. On policy, he points to the heart of the ACA: banning denials for preexisting conditions, curbing practices like rescissions and lifetime caps, instituting medical loss ratio rules and rate review, and building marketplaces with subsidies. These were intended to rebalance a market where insurers often set terms that left sick or unlucky people stranded. On politics, he assumes tangible benefits will overcome initial fears, a classic wager in social policy: enact a complex reform, survive the backlash, then reap credit as beneficiaries emerge.
The record is mixed but revealing. Protections for preexisting conditions became one of the law’s most popular pillars and remain politically untouchable. Insurers faced new constraints and consumer protections expanded, yet private carriers still administer much of the system and wield real leverage. Premiums did not uniformly skyrocket, but many unsubsidized buyers saw sharp increases, while subsidies shielded lower- and middle-income enrollees. The promise that people could keep existing plans ran into reality when noncompliant plans were canceled, feeding a potent backlash.
Biden’s prediction about political rewards arrived on a delay. Democrats suffered heavy losses in 2010, a sign that immediate reaction punished them. Over time, as coverage expanded through Medicaid and the exchanges and repeal efforts failed, public support rose, and the ACA became embedded in American life. The statement captures the tension of structural reform: voters judge not just intentions but lived outcomes, and even successful provisions require time to convert disruption into durable approval.
The appeal is both policy and politics. On policy, he points to the heart of the ACA: banning denials for preexisting conditions, curbing practices like rescissions and lifetime caps, instituting medical loss ratio rules and rate review, and building marketplaces with subsidies. These were intended to rebalance a market where insurers often set terms that left sick or unlucky people stranded. On politics, he assumes tangible benefits will overcome initial fears, a classic wager in social policy: enact a complex reform, survive the backlash, then reap credit as beneficiaries emerge.
The record is mixed but revealing. Protections for preexisting conditions became one of the law’s most popular pillars and remain politically untouchable. Insurers faced new constraints and consumer protections expanded, yet private carriers still administer much of the system and wield real leverage. Premiums did not uniformly skyrocket, but many unsubsidized buyers saw sharp increases, while subsidies shielded lower- and middle-income enrollees. The promise that people could keep existing plans ran into reality when noncompliant plans were canceled, feeding a potent backlash.
Biden’s prediction about political rewards arrived on a delay. Democrats suffered heavy losses in 2010, a sign that immediate reaction punished them. Over time, as coverage expanded through Medicaid and the exchanges and repeal efforts failed, public support rose, and the ACA became embedded in American life. The statement captures the tension of structural reform: voters judge not just intentions but lived outcomes, and even successful provisions require time to convert disruption into durable approval.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|
More Quotes by Joe
Add to List
