"Well it's not a matter for me to say what Llew Smith can or cannot do, he's an elected Member of Parliament"

The quote by Ron Davies, "Well it's not a matter for me to say what Llew Smith can or can not do, he's an elected Member of Parliament", reflects a nuanced understanding of political roles, obligations, and borders. To analyze this statement, it is necessary to think about the context in which it was made.

Firstly, Ron Davies acknowledges the democratic principle that chose officials have a required from their constituents. This implies Llew Smith, as an elected Member of Parliament (MP), is responsible to individuals who voted for him, rather than to other politicians. By mentioning it is not his place to dictate Smith's actions, Davies is appreciating the democratic process and the autonomy of specific MPs. This suggests a foundational respect for the organization of democracy and a recognition of the separations of power within political systems.

Secondly, the remark might be interpreted as deflecting any criticism or responsibility for Smith's actions or positions. By acknowledging Smith's self-reliance as an MP, Davies may be distancing himself from any possible debate or choice associated with Smith's conduct or declarations. This might show a strategic political maneuver to keep a neutral or non-confrontational position within the more comprehensive political landscape in which both people run.

Additionally, this declaration may suggest an understanding of the limits of influence and control one political leader can have over another. It highlights the decentralized nature of political authority in a democratic setup, where MPs have the freedom to express their beliefs and make decisions based on their judgment and constituents' requirements, rather than celebration lines or external pressures.

In essence, Ron Davies' remark is a recommendation of political courtesy, democratic principles, and the constrained company political leaders typically navigate. It highlights the complexity of political interactions where respect for individual functions and the electorate's voice is critical.