"Well, my definition of a tragedy is a clash between right and right"

Amos Oz's quote, "Well, my definition of a tragedy is a clash in between right and right", uses an extensive insight into the nature of conflict and moral intricacy. Unlike the more simplified view of tragedy as a battle in between great and evil, Oz recommends that true tragedy emerges when opposing forces, both with authenticity and righteousness, collide. This point of view welcomes us to review the diverse nature of human predicaments, where each side holds a principled standpoint, and yet their coexistence or resolution appears difficult.

In literature, standard catastrophes typically depict protagonists facing overwhelming external evils or internal flaws resulting in their failure. However, Oz's interpretation shifts the focus towards situations where the conflict is not derived from malice, but from the authenticity and credibility of both sides' values and beliefs. This provides a circumstance where, irrespective of the result, there is an inherent loss, since both opposing positions are worthy of to be honored.

Consider real-world scenarios typically filled with ethical predicaments, like debates over ecological conservation versus industrial development. Each side presents engaging arguments that accommodate basic human needs and values; ecologists advocate for the health of the planet, a right for future generations, while industrialists argue for economic advancement and improvement of living requirements, also a rightful pursuit.

Oz's disaster shows the essence of complexity in human relationships and societies, where what is 'right' for one can at the same time be 'right' for another, yet coexistence can be tough. This interpretation requires a more comprehensive understanding and empathy, advising people to value the nuanced nature of justice and conflict. It highlights the importance of dialogue, compromise, and understanding in dealing with disputes where an easy, specific service might not exist. Eventually, it highlights the significance of acknowledging and respecting differing yet valid perspectives in our pursuit of resolution and harmony.