"We've had risk assessments performed by Harvard University, which said that even if we did have a small number of cases in this country that the likelihood of it spreading or getting into any kind of human health problem is very, very small"

Ann Veneman is referencing the findings of a risk assessment conducted by Harvard University, specifically concerning the potential for a health issue arising from a small number of cases, presumably related to an infectious disease or foodborne illness, within a country. The emphasis rests on expert evaluation and the trustworthiness of such assessments. By stating that Harvard, a reputable academic institution, conducted the assessment, Veneman is appealing to authority to reinforce the reliability of the information and the carefulness with which the issue has been considered. This approach seeks to reassure the audience that the situation has been thoroughly analyzed by experts using scientific methods.

The content of the assessment, as Veneman summarizes, concludes that even if there are isolated instances or a limited number of cases, the chance of it escalating into a broader health crisis impacting humans is minimal. The use of phrases such as "very, very small" expresses a high degree of confidence in the containment measures and the overall safety of the general population. This repetition serves to convince listeners that the risk is not only low but almost negligible, thus reducing public anxiety or panic.

Furthermore, the statement may reflect on the effectiveness of policies, safety measures, or regulations already in place. By referencing the minimal likelihood of the situation worsening, there is an underlying endorsement of current practices or systems intended to prevent widespread outbreaks. This is often employed to defend existing procedures or to advocate against drastic policy changes in response to isolated incidents.

At a broader level, Veneman’s words carry the message that fears surrounding the issue in question are largely unfounded according to scientific analysis. As a government official, the reassurance serves both to protect public confidence and to maintain stability in the face of potentially alarming news. The invocation of academic authority, together with the assertion of a negligible threat, functions as a strategic communication designed to calm stakeholders and maintain trust in institutional oversight.