"What I found was when I started my first study, and then in subsequent studies, is here you have people under some kind of duress, or I chose to study them because they represented some kind of historical event, as it impacted on them or as they helped to create it"
About this Quote
Robert Jay Lifton sums up a career-long method: seek the human being where history strikes hardest, and also where human beings strike back by making history. He gravitated to people under duress not out of voyeurism but because extremity lays bare the forces that shape the self. From Chinese thought reform to Hiroshima survivors, from Vietnam veterans to Nazi doctors, he studied those who were intensely shaped by events and those who, often under institutional and ideological pressures, helped to shape them.
The emphasis on both impact and agency defines his psychohistorical approach. He shows how large-scale ideologies can colonize identity, what he called totalism, and how people adapt through psychic numbing, splitting, or what he famously termed doubling, the creation of a functional second self that could commit atrocities while leaving a moral self ostensibly intact. Yet he equally attends to how trauma can catalyze a survivor mission, turning suffering into ethical action and renewed meaning. In each case, the mind is neither a sealed interior nor a passive receptacle but an active participant in historical process.
There is an ethical argument embedded here. To understand perpetrators is not to absolve them; it is to map out atrocity-producing situations so they can be recognized and resisted. To listen to survivors is to honor testimony while discerning patterns of harm and resilience that stretch beyond individual stories. Lifton moves psychiatry onto a wider stage, insisting that diagnosis must include culture, institutions, and historical forces.
The line reads as a mission statement for witnessing: to study people at the pressure points of history in order to see how selves are made, unmade, and remade. Under duress, the human psyche reveals both its terrifying malleability and its capacity for moral repair. That double truth, for Lifton, is where psychological insight becomes civic responsibility.
The emphasis on both impact and agency defines his psychohistorical approach. He shows how large-scale ideologies can colonize identity, what he called totalism, and how people adapt through psychic numbing, splitting, or what he famously termed doubling, the creation of a functional second self that could commit atrocities while leaving a moral self ostensibly intact. Yet he equally attends to how trauma can catalyze a survivor mission, turning suffering into ethical action and renewed meaning. In each case, the mind is neither a sealed interior nor a passive receptacle but an active participant in historical process.
There is an ethical argument embedded here. To understand perpetrators is not to absolve them; it is to map out atrocity-producing situations so they can be recognized and resisted. To listen to survivors is to honor testimony while discerning patterns of harm and resilience that stretch beyond individual stories. Lifton moves psychiatry onto a wider stage, insisting that diagnosis must include culture, institutions, and historical forces.
The line reads as a mission statement for witnessing: to study people at the pressure points of history in order to see how selves are made, unmade, and remade. Under duress, the human psyche reveals both its terrifying malleability and its capacity for moral repair. That double truth, for Lifton, is where psychological insight becomes civic responsibility.
Quote Details
| Topic | Tough Times |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List
