"What passes for woman's intuition is often nothing more than man's transparency"
About this Quote
Nathan’s line is a neat little ambush: it pretends to puncture a flattering stereotype about women, then turns the blade toward men. “Woman’s intuition” was already a cultural compliment with a trapdoor in it, a way of praising women while keeping their knowledge mystical, irrational, and safely non-threatening. Nathan’s move is to de-mystify it. The “intuition” isn’t supernatural perception; it’s basic pattern recognition in a world where men broadcast their motives.
The real target is male self-regard. “Man’s transparency” is an insult dressed as a diagnosis: men imagine themselves complex strategists, but their desires and deceptions are so blunt they can be read at a glance. It’s also a jab at the social theater of early 20th-century gender relations, when women were expected to be emotional barometers and men were encouraged to be actors of authority. Nathan suggests the “actor” is terrible at the role, while the “barometer” is simply accurately reporting the obvious.
As an editor-critic with a reputation for aphoristic cruelty, Nathan is doing what he often did: using wit to collapse a comforting myth and expose the power dynamics underneath. The sentence works because it flips causality. It doesn’t argue that women are inherently “intuitive”; it argues that men are predictably legible. The subtext is almost contemporary: if someone seems magically good at reading you, consider whether you’re just narrating yourself too loudly.
The real target is male self-regard. “Man’s transparency” is an insult dressed as a diagnosis: men imagine themselves complex strategists, but their desires and deceptions are so blunt they can be read at a glance. It’s also a jab at the social theater of early 20th-century gender relations, when women were expected to be emotional barometers and men were encouraged to be actors of authority. Nathan suggests the “actor” is terrible at the role, while the “barometer” is simply accurately reporting the obvious.
As an editor-critic with a reputation for aphoristic cruelty, Nathan is doing what he often did: using wit to collapse a comforting myth and expose the power dynamics underneath. The sentence works because it flips causality. It doesn’t argue that women are inherently “intuitive”; it argues that men are predictably legible. The subtext is almost contemporary: if someone seems magically good at reading you, consider whether you’re just narrating yourself too loudly.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by George
Add to List









