"What we say is that democracy means that you have the right to vote without intimidation and undue burdens. But if you stand in line for six hours, technically, today there is no document, no standard, no law that says that that's wrong"

DeForest Soaries' statement points to a complex and often controversial issue within democratic systems, particularly in the context of the United States: the right to vote and the barriers that can weaken this right. His assertion highlights the disparity between the theoretical perfects of democracy and the useful realities that citizens may experience.

At its core, democracy is fundamentally about participation, mainly revealed through the right to vote. This right is generally acknowledged as necessary for the performance of a representative system where government shows individuals's will. Soaries underscores that democracy needs to involve the ability to vote free from intimidation and troublesome barriers. Preferably, the process ought to be accessible and uncomplicated to ensure that every qualified person can exercise this essential right without unnecessary difficulties.

However, Soaries' comment about standing in line for six hours serves as a poignant metaphor for the relentless, less visible barriers to voting that can disenfranchise communities. Long wait times at polling stations can be a substantial deterrent, successfully operating as a modern-day type of voter suppression. While there might not be specific laws or standards deeming this practice 'incorrect,' its existence recommends a gap in between the democratic concept of accessible voting and its practice.

These extended waiting times can disproportionately affect marginalized communities, raising concerns about equality and fairness in the electoral process. They can be symptomatic of deeper systemic problems such as inadequate ballot places, improperly resourced election facilities, or deliberate manipulation to influence voter turnout amongst particular demographics.

By highlighting the lack of explicit legal option or standards resolving long haul times, Soaries calls attention to the need for reform and watchfulness to protect voting accessibility. He implies a need to evolve our legal and policy frameworks to better show the spirit of democracy by actively removing all barriers to ballot, thus making sure that every citizen can take part similarly in the democratic procedure. In doing so, democracies can better align their practices with their fundamental perfects, promoting a genuinely inclusive and representative government.