"When I first started acting, and we would all sit down and talk about Shakespeare and how great it was. I thought well, I suppose it is"

Judy Davis's quote shows her early experiences in the acting world, highlighting her initial ambivalence towards the respect typically afforded to works by William Shakespeare. When Davis started her performing profession, it was most likely standard for stars to gather and discuss the benefits and luster of Shakespeare's plays, offered their main role in the canon of English literature and their frequent existence in acting curricula. The routine of stars talking about Shakespeare's work underscores the playwright's towering impact and the reverence in which his work is normally held.

Davis's admission, "I thought well, I expect it is", suggests a nuanced perspective. This phrase shows that, at the outset, she was somewhat hesitant or indifferent about Shakespeare's well-known status. Her use of "I suppose" indicates a tentative contract, maybe stemming from public opinion or the expectation to appreciate Shakespeare since of his established reputation. The comment might reflect a more youthful star's struggle to reconcile the cultural veneration for Shakespeare with their personal feelings or impulses about his works.

Moreover, Davis's reflection suggests the broader conversation about the accessibility and relatability of Shakespeare's plays for contemporary audiences and actors. While widely acknowledged for his extensive impact on language, storytelling, and character advancement, Shakespeare's plays typically include a barrier of antiquated language and themes that might not resonate with everyone similarly. Davis's preliminary doubt might be viewed as a natural response to an idealization that often accompanies scholastic and professional discussions about traditional literature.

In essence, Davis catches a minute of artistic introspection and advancement. Her words expose the journey of a star concerning terms with the heritage of their craft and the process of discovering individual meaning and connection in works that are universally recognized but separately experienced. This frank self-reflection is a testimony to the continuous discussion within actors as they browse and analyze traditional texts in their unique methods.