"When we deal with questions relating to principles of law and their applications, we do not suddenly rise into a stratosphere of icy certainty"
About this Quote
Legal reasoning loves to dress up as inevitability, and Hughes refuses the costume. The line punctures the comforting myth that law is a machine: feed in facts, turn the crank, receive Truth. By invoking a "stratosphere of icy certainty", he takes aim at the judicial pose of neutrality - the bench as a place above politics, temperament, and history. The metaphor matters. "Stratosphere" suggests altitude and distance; "icy" suggests sterility and emotional detachment. Hughes is warning that when judges pretend to hover up there, they’re not being rigorous, they’re being evasive.
The specific intent is almost disciplinary: a reminder to lawyers and judges that principles are not self-applying. "Principles of law" sounds grand and fixed, but "their applications" is where discretion enters, where competing values - liberty versus order, property versus equality, precedent versus practicality - start elbowing for space. Hughes doesn’t deny that law has structure; he denies that structure eliminates uncertainty. The subtext is a quiet rebuke to absolutists: the ones who cite doctrine as if it were physics, and the ones who treat interpretation as a moral alibi.
Contextually, Hughes lived through the period when American courts were openly wrestling with industrial capitalism, labor rights, and the expanding administrative state - fights that exposed how much judicial decision-making is shaped by assumptions about society. His realism isn’t cynicism; it’s accountability. If certainty isn’t available, then judges owe the public something harder: candor about judgment, limits, and the human stakes beneath the legal prose.
The specific intent is almost disciplinary: a reminder to lawyers and judges that principles are not self-applying. "Principles of law" sounds grand and fixed, but "their applications" is where discretion enters, where competing values - liberty versus order, property versus equality, precedent versus practicality - start elbowing for space. Hughes doesn’t deny that law has structure; he denies that structure eliminates uncertainty. The subtext is a quiet rebuke to absolutists: the ones who cite doctrine as if it were physics, and the ones who treat interpretation as a moral alibi.
Contextually, Hughes lived through the period when American courts were openly wrestling with industrial capitalism, labor rights, and the expanding administrative state - fights that exposed how much judicial decision-making is shaped by assumptions about society. His realism isn’t cynicism; it’s accountability. If certainty isn’t available, then judges owe the public something harder: candor about judgment, limits, and the human stakes beneath the legal prose.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List
