"When you have the facts on your side, argue the facts. When you have the law on your side, argue the law. When you have neither, holler"

The quote attributed to Al Gore-- although it has actually also been related to legal thinkers and has roots in legal technique-- encapsulates a practical method to argumentation, especially within the realms of law and politics, however relevant to other areas too. The declaration is divided into 3 unique techniques, each utilized based upon the strengths and weaknesses of one's position in a debate or a conflict.

To start with, "When you have the realities in your corner, argue the realities" stresses the power of empirical proof and data. Truths are objective and proven pieces of info that can boost one's argument by interesting logic and factor. In this situation, the recommended tactic is to focus on these realities, leveraging them to construct a compelling, fact-based narrative. Dependence on realities can enhance credibility and support a more powerful case in both legal and public arguments.

The 2nd part, "When you have the law on your side, argue the law," highlights the value of legal statutes and precedents. Laws offer a framework of guidelines that are widely acknowledged in the judicial system. If legal arguments line up with one's position, it becomes strategic to point out statutes, legal precedents, or constitutional analyses to validate and validate one's point. This approach is important in legal contexts where the result depends upon legal interpretation and procedural accuracy.

The last method, "When you have neither, holler," suggests turning to raising one's voice figuratively, or potentially literally, when lacking accurate support or legal grounding. This can imply utilizing rhetorical abilities to appeal emotionally or acquire attention through the force of delivery instead of compound. Such a method might involve convincing storytelling, emotional appeal, or charming presentation to sway opinions or obscure the absence of solid support.

In essence, the quote describes a ladder of argumentative methods, advising people to profit from their strengths-- be they accurate, legal, or rhetorical-- to navigate and affect disputes effectively, acknowledging the realities of persuasion when unbiased foundations are lacking.