"Without the United States, there simply would not have been an armed uprising in our country"

Daniel Ortega's statement, "Without the United States, there merely would not have actually been an armed uprising in our country", shows a profound critique of U.S. foreign policy and its historic involvement in the internal affairs of Nicaragua. Ortega, a prominent Nicaraguan political leader and leader of the Sandinista National Liberation Front, is likely alluding to the extensive influence that the United States has actually exerted over political, economic, and military matters in Latin America, especially during the Cold War age.

To translate this declaration, it is important to consider the historic context of U.S.-Nicaragua relations. During the Cold War, the United States was greatly invested in suppressing the spread of communism and socialist motions in the Western Hemisphere. In Nicaragua, the U.S. offered assistance to the Somoza regime, which was opposed by the Sandinistas, an advanced group led by Ortega that looked for to overthrow this dictatorial federal government. When the Sandinistas concerned power in 1979, their leftist orientation and ties to Soviet-aligned nations led the U.S. to fund and train Contra rebels to destabilize the Sandinista government. This intervention intensified internal conflicts and contributed significantly to the violent atmosphere and civil discontent in the nation.

Ortega's assertion recommends that without the U.S. intervention and its backing of counter-revolutionary forces, the scale and strength of the armed uprising may have been considerably minimized and even prevented. He implies that external factors, particularly the geopolitical interests of a significant power like the United States, played a crucial role in forming Nicaragua's trajectory of conflict and violence.

This declaration can also be considered a more comprehensive review of how foreign interventions can fire up or intensify domestic strife, often with lasting detriments to the impacted nations' social and economic stability. Ortega's opinion highlights the value of national sovereignty and alerts versus the effects that may arise from foreign disturbance in domestic affairs.