"Writing a novel is not method acting and I find it easy to step out of it at cocktail hour"

In this quote, Bret Easton Ellis highlights the difference in between literary creation and immersive performance, suggesting that writing a novel is basically different from approach acting. Approach performing is a method used by stars to deeply embody their characters by making use of individual experiences and emotions, often blurring the lines between the actor's identity and the character they're depicting. This immersive technique involves a constant, deep emotional and psychological investment, which can periodically take in the star's individual life.

Ellis contrasts this with the procedure of writing an unique, recommending that for him, writing does not require a similar level of individual emotional immersion. By stating "I discover it simple to step out of it at mixed drink hour", he communicates that, unlike technique stars, he can quickly shift from the world of his unique back to his daily life. The referral to "cocktail hour" evokes a picture of relaxation and social interaction, highlighting that he can separate his innovative process and personal life.

This perspective implies that Ellis maintains a clear limit between fiction and truth. He engages with his characters and stories with skill and commitment, however without losing himself in them. This ability to define his innovative work from his personal identity can be seen as an advantage, promoting psychological wellness by preventing the intensive emotional labor seen in technique performing.

Furthermore, this technique may talk to Ellis's confidence and experience as a writer. His ability permits him to handle the needs of storytelling without it frustrating his individual space. This separation underscores a professional discipline that treats fiction writing as a craft-- one that can be paused and resumed without total immersion, permitting the author to retain their autonomy and psychological balance.

Ultimately, Ellis's point of view highlights the variety of innovative processes, suggesting that profound literary production does not demand personal transformation or psychological residency in a narrative world, however rather experienced navigation between realms of creativity and truth.