"Yet it looks as if the thing we use to solve our problems with is the source of our problems. It's like going to the doctor and having him make you ill. In fact, in 20% of medical cases we do apparently have that going on. But in the case of thought, its far over 20%"

David Bohm, a renowned theoretical physicist and philosopher, explores the paradoxical nature of thought in this quote. The essence of his message is that while thought is an essential tool for human analytical, it is simultaneously the origin of lots of problems we deal with.

Bohm draws an analogy with the medical field to highlight this paradox. He compares the method thought functions to a doctor who accidentally makes a patient ill rather of treating their disorder. This example highlights the potential for unintended effects when a system implied to benefit develop into a source of harm. Bohm indicates that, although in medication such cases may be an anomaly-- taking place in only 20% of scenarios-- the problem is far more prevalent when it concerns believed.

This suggests a vital examination of our dependence on thought, meaning its double role as both a developer and solver of problems. The implication is that idea, while needed for development, science, and daily decision-making, can likewise perpetuate cycles of misunderstanding and conflict. For example, stiff patterns of believing might enhance bias, prevent open communication, or lead to incorrect assumptions. These cognitive biases or established belief systems can hamper genuine understanding and progress.

Bohm's perspective motivates a reflective position on the nature of believed itself. If thought is indeed responsible for many of our problems, the option is not merely to think more or harder; we must become mindful of our thinking processes, questioning the assumptions and structures we operate within. This awareness might motivate a shift towards more holistic, integrated approaches to problem-solving that transcend standard cognitive constraints.

Therefore, Bohm's insight forces us to end up being more cognizant of how our ideas influence our perceptions and actions. In doing so, we might navigate the complexities of human thought more effectively, lessening its propensity to unintentionally trigger issues.