"You can mostly forget ethnic or religious differences. The competition for a bigger share of the oil proceeds is behind much of the fighting"

Ed Harris' quote highlights the complicated interaction in between resource control and socio-political stress, particularly in regions rich in resources such as oil. He recommends that while ethnic or spiritual differences are often highlighted as primary reasons for conflict, the underlying and more considerable motivator is the competitors for wealth and resources-- in this case, oil proceeds.

This point of view aligns with the Resource Curse Theory, which presumes that nations or regions with plentiful natural deposits typically experience less economic development, less democracy, and worse advancement results than nations with less natural resources. These disputes arise since numerous groups, whether they be ethnic, tribal, or political, vie for control of these financially rewarding resources. The competition for these resources can exacerbate existing tensions or create brand-new rifts, as control over resource wealth typically equates to power and influence.

Harris indicates that disputes labeled as ethnic or religious might be more properly viewed through the lens of resource competition. This viewpoint encourages a much deeper analysis of apparently identity-based disputes, triggering the consideration of economic inspirations that might not be instantly visible.

In addition, the quote highlights how resource wealth can cause corruption, as different factions might be willing to engage in prolonged conflict to gain access to financially rewarding oil earnings. This battle for resources can perpetuate cycles of violence, as included celebrations might prioritize short-term gains over long-lasting stability and peace.

Addressing such conflicts requires more than just acknowledging ethnic or spiritual tensions. It requires openness in resource management, equitable distribution of wealth, and inclusive governance. By focusing on the financial underpinnings of dispute, it might be possible to develop techniques that mitigate violence, foster cooperation, and promote sustainable development.

Ultimately, Harris' words welcome policymakers, scholars, and peacebuilders to look underneath surface-level explanations and address the financial motorists of conflict, proposing options that target the roots instead of merely the symptoms.