"You'll find individuals agreeing on this, but when they get into collective societies and larger groups they find it difficult to achieve group agreement"

Neale Donald Walsch's quote highlights the often complicated dynamics in between specific beliefs and collective consensus within groups. The essence of the quote underscores a typical social phenomenon: while people may easily concern individual conclusions or concur with one another in smaller sized interactions, equating these specific agreements into a cumulative agreement can be remarkably challenging at larger scales.

When people form viewpoints or agree with others on a one-to-one basis, there is generally less intricacy included. Everyone's choices, predispositions, and expectations can be more easily interacted and worked out. In such intimate settings, the alignment of ideas typically transpires since people have more direct interactions, permitting immediate feedback and changes to understandings.

However, this dynamic shifts when individuals try to form an agreement within larger groups or societies. As the variety of individuals involved boosts, so do the variables, including the diversity of viewpoints, cultural backgrounds, individual interests, and life experiences. These differences can cause misconceptions, miscommunications, and conflicts, making it challenging to attain unanimity. Additionally, larger groups frequently need official structures and decision-making processes, which can even more make complex matters due to bureaucracy or differing top priorities.

Group characteristics likewise present the concept of social influence. In larger neighborhoods, individuals may feel pressured to conform to the majority or dominant viewpoint, resulting in surface-level contract. However, this facade frequently does not have the depth and genuine agreement of private agreements, and the underlying dissent can prevent real collective progress.

Walsch appears to recommend that the more people associated with a decision-making procedure, the more layers of intricacy are included. This challenges the group to find commonalities, highlighting the need for empathy, reliable communication, and structured settlement to navigate the complexities of collective contract. On a wider scale, this quote can be used to understanding political systems, organizational structures, and neighborhood planning, where accomplishing consistency and agreement is central yet often filled with barriers.