Essay: Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation

Introduction
"Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation" is an essay by President Ronald Reagan released in 1984. The essay reviews the moral as well as moral issues bordering abortion, the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court choice of 1973 that legalized abortion in the United States, and the duty of public policy in securing the sanctity of human life. Reagan says that the current culture of abortion in America has actually caused a decline in respect permanently and also a lessened gratitude for human self-respect.

Decreasing the Value of Life
Reagan starts his essay by remembering historic incidents of mass murder and genocide, such as the Holocaust, and just how leaders justified these work as belonging of their responsibility to their country. The essay then connects these historic events to the normalization of abortion in the United States. Reagan argues that cultures that accept abortion are remaining to decrease the value of human life, just as those historic atrocities did.

The President insists that every person has a right to life, which is an unalienable right granted by the Creator as well as identified in the Declaration of Independence. Reagan assumes that as soon as a country accepts the premise that life can be taken at ease, there can be no reasonable debate versus the discontinuation of life at any type of stage or for any factor, including individuals with disabilities, the elderly, or those considered socially unwanted.

Critiquing Roe v. Wade
Reagan critiques the Roe v. Wade decision, arguing that it has resulted in the destruction of human life. He claims that the Court misshaped the language of the Constitution to reach their decision, specifically the Fourteenth Amendment. Reagan points out that the majority viewpoint in the event counted on the right to privacy, however the word 'abortion' is not mentioned within the Constitution. Consequently, Reagan believes this judgment stood for a grave oppression and developed a circumstance where coming youngsters have no constitutional rights.

The President also highlights the contradictions in American law. For example, a youngster that is killed during an attack on a pregnant female can be considered a murder victim, while a coming child can be aborted legally. This variance, Reagan says, reveals the incongruities in the lawful reasoning utilized by the Supreme Court in the Roe v. Wade judgment.

Abortion as well as Public Policy
Reagan says that public law needs to be guided by ethical concepts, and the defense of human life. He applauds those who fight to curb the validity of abortion, mentioning that their dedication is essential to promote the regulation of regulation as well as the sacredness of life. Reagan emphasizes the importance of passing legislation, such as the 1984 Mexico City Policy, which prevents United States government funds from being made use of to promote or do abortions in various other countries. In Reagan's view, this policy stands for a necessary action in attesting the worth of human life.

The President also reviews the value of offering support to pregnant ladies, supplying them choices to abortion, and producing a society that accepts as well as commemorates life. He highlights the demand to improve fostering possibilities and promote much better accessibility to prenatal care for women.

Final thought
Ronald Reagan's essay "Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation" offers a strong disagreement against the normalization of abortion in American society and the Roe v. Wade choice. The President believes that security of life is an ethical imperative that need to assist public law and that the United States need to function towards cultivating a culture that values and appreciates human life at all phases.

Reagan emphasizes the value of sustaining women with options to abortion, promoting adoption, and enhancing prenatal treatment. The essay functions as a powerful tip of the need to worth and also safeguard human life, which Reagan thinks is the foundation of a simply culture.