"A science is something which is constructed from truth on workable axioms. There are 55 axioms in scientology which are very demonstrably true, and on these can be constructed a great deal"

L. Ron Hubbard's quote presents a perspective on the nature of science and its fundamental aspects. He asserts that a legitimate science is built upon "truth" and "workable axioms". The quote implies that the robustness of a scientific discipline is contingent on its foundational concepts and their capability to withstand examination and application in the real world.

Hubbard specifies that Scientology, the religious motion he established, is structured around 55 axioms. He explains these axioms as "really demonstrably true", suggesting that they are self-evident or verifiable by empirical observation. In traditional scientific disciplines, axioms function as standard principles or assumptions from which more knowledge and understandings can be logically derived. By claiming that Scientology is developed on such axioms, Hubbard is placing it as a genuine field of questions or practice, similar to established sciences.

The phrase "a lot can be constructed" indicates Hubbard's belief in the expansive potential of Scientology based on its fundamental axioms. He recommends that these concepts generate a detailed structure that can describe or resolve various elements of human experience and behavior. This lines up with Scientology's objective to offer paths towards personal advancement, spiritual knowledge, and dealing with psychological health problems.

Nevertheless, the notion of what makes up "fact" and "workable axioms" can be controversial, specifically in the context of Scientology, which has typically been slammed for doing not have empirical assistance and drawing suspicion from the scientific community. Critics argue that while axiom-based systems are core to clinical exploration, the veracity of Scientology's axioms stays unverified by extensive, generally accepted clinical techniques.

Hence, Hubbard's quote can be analyzed as a defense of Scientology's credibility as a science by equating it with the structural structures of empirical sciences, while also inviting examination about the criteria utilized to develop its purported "realities.".