"Right now we think that rates will stay low, that you'll be able to get a mortgage below seven percent and that's kicked off a refinance boom that's going to put more money in the pockets of consumers"
About this Quote
There is a seduction built into the calm managerial tone here: a promise that the macroeconomy has been domesticated. Raines doesn’t argue for low rates; he treats them as a sensible baseline, a weather report from someone who wants to be mistaken for the climate itself. “Right now we think” is the tell. It’s a hedge disguised as authority, a way to circulate confidence while retaining plausible deniability if the forecast breaks.
The intent is practical and political at once. On the surface, it’s a consumer-friendly sales pitch: mortgages under seven percent, refinancing, extra cash. Underneath, it’s a defense of a specific growth model that turns household balance sheets into an engine of demand. The “boom” language frames debt restructuring as a kind of stimulus package that doesn’t require Congress, only compliant markets and a steady appetite for mortgage-backed securities.
The subtext is that prosperity can be engineered through liquidity and optimism, that consumer “pockets” are where economic legitimacy is earned. But notice what’s absent: risk, wage growth, inequality, the fragility of tying spending power to housing values and interest-rate policy. The quote sits squarely in the late-1990s/early-2000s consensus that rising homeownership and cheap credit were self-evident public goods. Coming from a top housing-finance executive, it also functions as narrative management: if refinancing is framed as consumer empowerment, then the institutions enabling it look like benefactors, not leverage merchants.
It works because it offers an easy causal story: lower rates -> refinancing -> cash -> happier consumers. The elegance is the danger. Economic complexity gets compressed into a reassurance, and reassurance, in finance, is often the product being sold.
The intent is practical and political at once. On the surface, it’s a consumer-friendly sales pitch: mortgages under seven percent, refinancing, extra cash. Underneath, it’s a defense of a specific growth model that turns household balance sheets into an engine of demand. The “boom” language frames debt restructuring as a kind of stimulus package that doesn’t require Congress, only compliant markets and a steady appetite for mortgage-backed securities.
The subtext is that prosperity can be engineered through liquidity and optimism, that consumer “pockets” are where economic legitimacy is earned. But notice what’s absent: risk, wage growth, inequality, the fragility of tying spending power to housing values and interest-rate policy. The quote sits squarely in the late-1990s/early-2000s consensus that rising homeownership and cheap credit were self-evident public goods. Coming from a top housing-finance executive, it also functions as narrative management: if refinancing is framed as consumer empowerment, then the institutions enabling it look like benefactors, not leverage merchants.
It works because it offers an easy causal story: lower rates -> refinancing -> cash -> happier consumers. The elegance is the danger. Economic complexity gets compressed into a reassurance, and reassurance, in finance, is often the product being sold.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Franklin
Add to List
