"And these two elements are at odds with one another because Freud is utterly adversary to almost all the ways of structuring the human experience found in Western religions. No Western religion can countenance Freud's view of man"
About this Quote
Potok frames Freud less as a psychologist than as a cultural solvent: a thinker whose basic architecture of the self can’t be laid neatly over the spiritual blueprints of the West. The friction he names isn’t a small doctrinal quarrel; it’s a clash of operating systems. Western religions, in their mainstream forms, tend to organize human life around covenant, conscience, sin, redemption, and a self that can choose, repent, and be transformed. Freud reorganizes the same terrain around appetite, repression, unconscious conflict, and the unsettling idea that the “I” is not reliably in charge.
The intent is polemical but not merely anti-Freud. Potok, a novelist steeped in Jewish tradition, is diagnosing why Freud became such a lightning rod in religious communities: not because he’s “immoral,” but because he makes religious explanations feel like after-the-fact rationalizations. If desire and guilt are products of psychic machinery and childhood history, then confession starts to look like symptom management; revelation starts to look like wish fulfillment; the soul starts to look like a narrative we tell to domesticate chaos.
His absolutist phrasing (“No Western religion”) is doing strategic work. It heightens the stakes, turning a debate about compatibility into a contest over who gets to define “man.” The subtext is a familiar Potok theme: modernity doesn’t politely add itself to tradition; it competes with it. Freud isn’t just another idea to be absorbed. He demands a different map of meaning, and Potok is warning that religious life can’t stay unchanged if it takes Freud seriously.
The intent is polemical but not merely anti-Freud. Potok, a novelist steeped in Jewish tradition, is diagnosing why Freud became such a lightning rod in religious communities: not because he’s “immoral,” but because he makes religious explanations feel like after-the-fact rationalizations. If desire and guilt are products of psychic machinery and childhood history, then confession starts to look like symptom management; revelation starts to look like wish fulfillment; the soul starts to look like a narrative we tell to domesticate chaos.
His absolutist phrasing (“No Western religion”) is doing strategic work. It heightens the stakes, turning a debate about compatibility into a contest over who gets to define “man.” The subtext is a familiar Potok theme: modernity doesn’t politely add itself to tradition; it competes with it. Freud isn’t just another idea to be absorbed. He demands a different map of meaning, and Potok is warning that religious life can’t stay unchanged if it takes Freud seriously.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|
More Quotes by Chaim
Add to List
