"And what do Democrats stand for, if they are so ready to defame concerned citizens as the "mob" - a word betraying a Marie Antoinette delusion of superiority to ordinary mortals. I thought my party was populist, attentive to the needs and wishes of those outside the power structure. And as a product of the 1960s, I thought the Democratic party was passionately committed to freedom of thought and speech"
- Camille Paglia
About this Quote
In this quote, Camille Paglia provides a vital evaluation of the viewed disconnect in between the Democratic Party's suitables and its actions, particularly in the context of identifying concerned residents as a "mob." The use of the term "mob" recommends an effort to weaken or delegitimize these individuals, implying they are rowdy or irrational rather than really concerned. By using this phrase, Paglia indicates that the party may be dismissing genuine grassroots concerns rather of engaging with them constructively.
Paglia draws a parallel to Marie Antoinette, a renowned symbol of stylish detachment and elitism, to suggest that those within the Democratic Party may possess an undeserved sense of supremacy over typical residents. This comparison tips that some party members might view themselves as above the fray, detached from or disinterested in the ordinary people's battles. This understanding starkly contrasts the populist image that Democrats traditionally sought to uphold-- one where the party is viewed as a champion of the typical person, attentive to needs and complaints beyond recognized power structures.
Paglia further invokes her experiences and the historic context of the 1960s to underscore her dissatisfaction. During that era, the Democratic Party was frequently connected with countercultural motions advocating totally free idea and speech, challenging social standards, and championing private rights and liberties. Paglia appears to recommend that this spirit of openness and engagement has actually waned, changed by a party less tolerant of differing perspectives or criticism.
In essence, the quote is both a review and a lament, questioning whether the Democratic Party still embodies the worths of populism and intellectual liberty it once loved. Paglia invites reflection on whether the party lines up with its fundamental concepts or warrants reevaluation and modification to much better serve its constituents.
This quote is written / told by Camille Paglia somewhere between April 2, 1947 and today. She was a famous Author from USA.
The author also have 32 other quotes.
"We are all different. Yet we are all God's children. We are all united behind this country and the common cause of freedom, justice, fairness, and equality. That is what unites us"
"The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all the states of created beings capable of law, where there is no law, there is no freedom"
