"Caring for children is a dance between setting appropriate limits as caretakers and avoiding unnecessary power struggles that result in unhappiness"
About this Quote
Parenting, in Charlotte Davis Kasl's framing, isn’t a battle to be won; it’s choreography. The word "dance" is doing heavy lifting here, recasting childrearing as responsive movement rather than rigid command-and-control. A dance has structure, yes, but it also requires attunement: reading the other person’s cues, adjusting your step, knowing when to lead and when to yield. That metaphor quietly rejects the popular fantasy that good caretaking is just the right set of rules applied with enough consistency.
Kasl’s real target is the ego trap embedded in "power struggles". She implies that many conflicts with children aren’t about safety or values but about adults defending authority for its own sake, often to soothe their own anxiety. The subtext is almost therapeutic: if every boundary becomes a referendum on who’s in charge, caretaking turns into chronic escalation, and the household pays in "unhappiness" - a word that lands softly but points to an accumulation of resentment, shame, and emotional fatigue.
The phrase "appropriate limits" matters because it refuses the false choice between permissive parenting and authoritarian parenting. Limits are necessary; the question is whether they serve the child’s development or the caretaker’s need to feel in control. Contextually, this sits squarely in a late-20th/early-21st-century parenting culture shaped by psychology, attachment language, and a growing suspicion of punitive discipline. Kasl offers a pragmatic ethic: enforce boundaries that protect and teach, drop the battles that only perform dominance.
Kasl’s real target is the ego trap embedded in "power struggles". She implies that many conflicts with children aren’t about safety or values but about adults defending authority for its own sake, often to soothe their own anxiety. The subtext is almost therapeutic: if every boundary becomes a referendum on who’s in charge, caretaking turns into chronic escalation, and the household pays in "unhappiness" - a word that lands softly but points to an accumulation of resentment, shame, and emotional fatigue.
The phrase "appropriate limits" matters because it refuses the false choice between permissive parenting and authoritarian parenting. Limits are necessary; the question is whether they serve the child’s development or the caretaker’s need to feel in control. Contextually, this sits squarely in a late-20th/early-21st-century parenting culture shaped by psychology, attachment language, and a growing suspicion of punitive discipline. Kasl offers a pragmatic ethic: enforce boundaries that protect and teach, drop the battles that only perform dominance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Parenting |
|---|
More Quotes by Charlotte
Add to List
