"Commitments the voters don't know about can't hurt you"
About this Quote
Ogden Nash distills a politician’s survival rule into a single, barbed epigram: keep your deals invisible and you keep your skin intact. The voice is an unscrupulous strategist’s, not a moralist’s. Harm is defined not by the quality of an action, but by the likelihood of its exposure. Ethics become a matter of public relations; guilt is less corrosive than headlines. That inversion is where the wit bites, because it reframes politics as a game of concealment rather than deliberation.
The line evokes the old world of smoke-filled rooms, party machines, and backroom bargaining, but it also fits contemporary politics with unsettling ease. Commitments to donors, lobbyists, and power brokers can shape policy as much as campaign platforms, yet only the latter are staged for the public. Nash implies a structural incentive for secrecy: if voters punish broken promises but cannot weigh promises they never hear, politicians will hide the very commitments most likely to provoke backlash. Accountability becomes a function of visibility, and those who control what is visible can tilt the field.
There is a double indictment here. Politicians are tempted to privilege plausible deniability over integrity, and the electorate is portrayed as reactive, focused on what surfaces rather than what governs beneath. The media ecosystem becomes decisive: investigative reporting, leaks, FOIA requests, and whistleblowers threaten the protective layer of obscurity. In an era of constant surveillance and instantaneous outrage, secrecy seems harder, yet disinformation and noise can make real commitments harder to detect. The quip remains painfully current.
Read as satire, the sentence warns that democracy depends on transparency to convert private bargaining into public consent. A politics that relies on hidden obligations may avoid immediate harm, but it corrodes trust and narrows the space for genuine choice. Nash’s light touch sharpens a heavy truth: the health of self-government is measured by what citizens are allowed to know, not by what leaders manage to hide.
The line evokes the old world of smoke-filled rooms, party machines, and backroom bargaining, but it also fits contemporary politics with unsettling ease. Commitments to donors, lobbyists, and power brokers can shape policy as much as campaign platforms, yet only the latter are staged for the public. Nash implies a structural incentive for secrecy: if voters punish broken promises but cannot weigh promises they never hear, politicians will hide the very commitments most likely to provoke backlash. Accountability becomes a function of visibility, and those who control what is visible can tilt the field.
There is a double indictment here. Politicians are tempted to privilege plausible deniability over integrity, and the electorate is portrayed as reactive, focused on what surfaces rather than what governs beneath. The media ecosystem becomes decisive: investigative reporting, leaks, FOIA requests, and whistleblowers threaten the protective layer of obscurity. In an era of constant surveillance and instantaneous outrage, secrecy seems harder, yet disinformation and noise can make real commitments harder to detect. The quip remains painfully current.
Read as satire, the sentence warns that democracy depends on transparency to convert private bargaining into public consent. A politics that relies on hidden obligations may avoid immediate harm, but it corrodes trust and narrows the space for genuine choice. Nash’s light touch sharpens a heavy truth: the health of self-government is measured by what citizens are allowed to know, not by what leaders manage to hide.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|
More Quotes by Ogden
Add to List
