"Common sense and history tell you that rewarding illegal behavior will only encourage more of it"

The quote by Ric Keller, "Good sense and history tell you that rewarding illegal behavior will only encourage more of it", recommends that incentivizing or stopping working to penalize unlawful actions may result in a boost in such behaviors. This notion is rooted in both instinctive reasoning and empirical evidence.

From a common-sense perspective, habits often follows a pattern of reinforcement. If people discover that unlawful actions lead to positive outcomes without unfavorable effects, they are more likely to duplicate these actions. This aligns with the fundamental principles of behavioral psychology, which indicate that behaviors followed by rewards tend to be strengthened and therefore repeated. For example, if stealing leads to material gain without penalty, it is logically encouraged.

Historically, this concept has actually been observed in numerous contexts. In governance and policy, regimes that tacitly accept corruption typically deal with increasing levels of it. When authorities see that corrupt habits goes unpunished or is even rewarded with allurements and power, it ends up being more prevalent. Likewise, in more ordinary societal settings, if truancy is ignored or indirectly encouraged by lax scholastic policies, students might be more inclined to avoid school, thinking there are little to no consequences.

Keller's statement can be seen through the lens of immigration policy, a context in which it is frequently priced estimate. Some argue that pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, often viewed as satisfying prohibited entry, might cause further unlawful migration. Opponents of such policies claim that it sends out a message that breaching migration laws will ultimately result in favorable results.

However, counterarguments recommend that the issue is more intricate. Critics of the rigorous "reward and penalty" point of view argue that dealing with source-- such as economic disparity, persecution, or lack of access to legal migration channels-- may be more effective than merely concentrating on punitive measures.

In summary, Keller's quote highlights the value of considering the broader ramifications of policies and practices that might accidentally motivate unlawful habits. By heeding lessons from both common sense and historical precedent, it advocates for techniques that prevent rather than unintentionally promote prohibited actions.