"Common sense, in so far as it exists, is all for the bourgeoisie. Nonsense is the privilege of the aristocracy. The worries of the world are for the common people"

George Jean Nathan's quote explores the distribution of societal functions and the distinct worlds of believed attributed to various social classes. At its core, the quote provides a satirical commentary on the socio-economic structures of his time, which can still resonate today.

The expression "Common sense, in up until now as it exists, is all for the bourgeoisie" suggests that practical wisdom and rational thought-- what we frequently refer to as "common sense"-- are mostly the domain of the middle class, or the bourgeoisie. This class, concentrated on product success and stability, is viewed as sticking to practical and often conservative values that prioritize the upkeep and development of their economic status. The bourgeoisie, being financially driven and reasonable, tend towards reasoning and functionality.

In contrast, "Nonsense is the advantage of the upper class" paints an image of the upper class, or the upper class, as having the luxury to enjoy the absurd or illogical. Nathan implies that the aristocracy, due to their wealth and status, are liberated from the ordinary issues of daily presence that bind the middle class. This freedom allows them to take part in pursuits or concepts that may seem ridiculous to others, but which are a testimony to their separated and unburdened position in society. Their benefit affords them the capability to captivate ideas and lifestyles that defy traditional reasoning.

Lastly, "The concerns of the world are for the common individuals" concentrates on the proletariat or working class. Nathan recommends that it is the common people who bear the brunt of the world's anxieties. Without the monetary cushion of the bourgeoisie or the privilege of the aristocracy, they are left to face the immediate obstacles of survival, making their lives filled with the everyday worries of financial and existential insecurity.

In general, Nathan's quote critiques social hierarchies, highlighting how different classes are bound by distinct realms of idea and concern, frequently to the hinderance or at the expenditure of the most susceptible-- the common people.