"Consider the Essay as a political pamphlet on the Revolution side, and the fact that it was the Whig gospel for a century, and you will see its working merit"
About this Quote
Frederick Pollock's quote welcomes readers to take a look at an essay not simply as a piece of literary work, but as a potent political instrument. By comparing the essay to a "political handout" from the "Revolution side", Pollock stresses the essay's function in advocating for transformative, perhaps radical, modification. Pamphlets traditionally played an important part in affecting public opinion and galvanizing assistance throughout advanced times, often defined by their seriousness and persuasive rhetoric.
In aligning the essay with pamphlets from advanced contexts, Pollock recommends an inherent advocacy for development, reform, and possibly the overthrowing of established norms or systems. The essay, in this sense, ends up being an active participant in political discourse, prompting readers to reconsider existing paradigms. This aligns with the Whig interpretation-- it supports the Whigs, a political faction understood in Britain for promoting constitutional monarchism, parliamentary supremacy, and later liberal reforms. Labeling the essay as "the Whig gospel for a century" highlights its influence and ideological alignment. The term "gospel" indicates not just a fundamental or authorized teaching however also recommends a story that guides ethical or political beliefs.
Pollock's expression "working merit" shows the essay's practical effectiveness in the socio-political arena. This benefit is not determined by literary quality alone but by its concrete influence on political idea and action over a prolonged period. The essay's advocacy for Whig concepts like liberty, development, and reform had concrete societal ramifications, becoming a doctrinal beacon assisting political debates and forming public law.
In essence, Pollock implores readers to appreciate essays as dynamic representatives of modification, capable of shaping and shifting political landscapes, instead of merely fixed texts. By recognizing the essay's role in promoting for innovative concepts and its location as an assisting teaching for the Whig party, we appreciate its extensive and long-lasting impact on political thought and public law.
About the Author