"Cunning... is but the low mimic of wisdom"

Cunning and wisdom might, at first glance, appear to be closely related traits; both involve the exercise of intelligence, anticipation, and insight. Yet Plato draws a sharp distinction between them. Cunning operates in the shadows, relying on misdirection, sly tactics, and self-serving maneuvering. It is tactical, often focused on immediate gain without consideration for broader consequences or ethical standards. The cunning individual, therefore, is skilled in the art of deception, finding clever ways around obstacles and exploiting weaknesses in others.

Wisdom, in contrast, embodies far greater depth. It is rooted in sound judgment, virtue, and the pursuit of truth. Wisdom seeks the good not only for oneself but also for the collective, bearing in mind the long-term effects of actions and decisions. Where cunning manipulates, wisdom guides. The wise person perceives the world not merely as an array of opportunities for personal advancement, but as a complex, interconnected system requiring care, understanding, and responsibility.

Labeling cunning as “the low mimic of wisdom” emphasizes its superficial similarity and deeper inferiority. Cunning attempts to imitate the perceptiveness and savvy of wisdom but lacks its underlying moral structure and higher purpose. It relies on craftiness without conscience, calculation without compassion. Wisdom’s effectiveness, meanwhile, stems from integrity and a dedication to what is just, not merely what is possible.

Plato’s comparison invites reflection on the motivations behind our actions. Do we employ our intellect in pursuit of fleeting advantage, or do we commit ourselves to the greater good with patience and foresight? The allure of cunning lies in its apparent effectiveness, but it cannot build lasting harmony or trust. Wisdom, though harder to practice and slower in its rewards, achieves enduring fulfillment and honor, standing as a beacon far above its lesser imitation.