"Disguise our bondage as we will, 'Tis woman, woman, rules us still"

Thomas More's quote, "Disguise our bondage as we will, 'T is female, female, guidelines us still", can be interpreted as a reflection on the profound and subtle impact that women have actually traditionally wielded, frequently in environments where they might not have held formal power. More's choice of the word "chains" suggests that the influence females apply is prevalent, inevitable, and deeply felt, even when society tries to mask or deny it. The repeating of "female, female" highlights the value and persistence of this influence.

During More's time, much like lots of other historic periods, societal structures were mainly patriarchal, with men dominating political, economic, and legal spheres. However, this doesn't inform the entire story of gender characteristics. More appears to acknowledge an underlying social fact: in spite of social norms that may rule over females formally, they continue to exert an effective and consistent sway over males and societal affairs. This power might manifest through personal relationships, family structures, courtly impact, or other less formal modes of effect.

The quote invites us to consider the complex functions that women have played throughout history. Beyond the class structure of the state and economy, women have actually been pivotal in forming cultural standards, moral standards, and familial legacies. Their influence can be seen in literature, art, faith, and social relationships. Consequently, More's observation is not almost acknowledging a power imbalance, but about highlighting the nuanced forms of company and authority females possess, typically in contrast to the obvious power held by guys.

Furthermore, the quote may also stimulate a more personal interpretation. On a specific level, it could indicate the emotional and ethical hold that ladies often have in intimate settings, such as marriages or families. This impact can cause a reassessment of where real power lies and how it is acknowledged or ignored within social constructs.

In general, More's words invite reflection on the complexities of power, authority, and gender dynamics, both in historical contexts and contemporary understandings.