"Yet consider now, whether women are not quite past sense and reason, when they want to rule over men"
About this Quote
Calvin speaks from a world convinced that God arranged creation in hierarchies. Male headship in home, church, and polity seemed not a social preference but a divine ordinance. When he calls women who seek to rule over men past sense and reason, he is not merely insulting; he is framing political ambition as rebellion against the created order. The line draws on Scripture he read as normative, especially Genesis 3:16, 1 Corinthians 14:34, and 1 Timothy 2:12, where teaching and authority over men are restricted to men. Isaiah 3:12, lamenting times when children and women rule, also stands behind his vision of disorder as a mark of divine judgment.
The mid-sixteenth century sharpened these convictions. Europe was governed by a string of formidable queens and regents, among them Mary Tudor, Mary of Guise, Mary Queen of Scots, Catherine de Medici, and later Elizabeth I. Their reigns overlapped with fierce confessional conflicts, so debates about female sovereignty were also debates about the future of Protestantism. John Knox thundered against female rule without qualification; Calvin was more cautious but still believed it contrary to nature and Scripture, tolerable only under providential necessity. His pastoral practice shows the tension: he could collaborate with Jeanne dAlbret, the Huguenot queen of Navarre, because her power shielded Protestants, yet he did not recant the principle of male governance.
The rhetoric of women wanting to rule aimed to police boundaries between spheres. In his mind it protected church and commonwealth from chaos, anchoring social peace in a theology of order. To modern readers shaped by egalitarian ideals, the judgment sounds harsh and unjust. Understanding its logic, however, illuminates how Reformation theology sustained broader structures of patriarchy. The line defends what Calvin thought a cosmic alignment, even as it helped justify systems that narrowed womens agency for centuries.
The mid-sixteenth century sharpened these convictions. Europe was governed by a string of formidable queens and regents, among them Mary Tudor, Mary of Guise, Mary Queen of Scots, Catherine de Medici, and later Elizabeth I. Their reigns overlapped with fierce confessional conflicts, so debates about female sovereignty were also debates about the future of Protestantism. John Knox thundered against female rule without qualification; Calvin was more cautious but still believed it contrary to nature and Scripture, tolerable only under providential necessity. His pastoral practice shows the tension: he could collaborate with Jeanne dAlbret, the Huguenot queen of Navarre, because her power shielded Protestants, yet he did not recant the principle of male governance.
The rhetoric of women wanting to rule aimed to police boundaries between spheres. In his mind it protected church and commonwealth from chaos, anchoring social peace in a theology of order. To modern readers shaped by egalitarian ideals, the judgment sounds harsh and unjust. Understanding its logic, however, illuminates how Reformation theology sustained broader structures of patriarchy. The line defends what Calvin thought a cosmic alignment, even as it helped justify systems that narrowed womens agency for centuries.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List



