"Divisions of the kind were fashionable at that time, and it was so easy to stifle one's need to help by deciding that help could neither be accepted nor understood"

Janet Frame's quote touches on the social and psychological dynamics of her time, along with the human propensity to rationalize inaction or indifference. At its core, the quote reviews how societal departments-- possibly of class, race, ideology, or perhaps geography-- were prevalent and accepted as normative. Frame recommends that these departments were "trendy", implying a sense of social or cultural trendiness that may have made them attractive or, a minimum of, broadly accepted without critical assessment.

The notion of fashionability here serves to critique how quickly societies can slip into patterns of exclusion and judgment, normalizing barriers that prevent authentic human connection or understanding. The "divisions" suggest built separations that dissuade compassion and uniformity. This context provides the backdrop for the ease with which individuals might "suppress one's need to help". The expression suggests an internal dispute-- an innate human impulse towards generosity and support is present, however quickly reduced within the boundaries of social norms.

Frame indicate the psychological gymnastics people employ to validate ignoring the requirements of others. By deciding that help "might neither be accepted nor understood", individuals absolve themselves of the obligation to provide support. This rationalization recommends a twofold detachment: initially, the belief that those in requirement are either incapable of receiving aid correctly or lack the capability to comprehend its intent; second, it highlights a deeper relational space, where understanding-- both of the other's plight and of one's own capability to assist-- is deemed inaccessible. This allows indifference to masquerade as usefulness.

In critiquing this state of mind, Janet Frame highlights a broader existential and ethical concern about the role of individuals within societal structures: whether one picks to follow divisive standards or challenges them by embracing vulnerability and shared humanity-- a challenge that remains ever pertinent.