"Do not read, as children do, to amuse yourself, or like the ambitious, for the purpose of instruction. No, read in order to live"
About this Quote
Flaubert’s line is a slap at two lazy alibis for reading: candy and credentialing. The first is childish, not because pleasure is bad, but because it’s passive consumption, a book as toy. The second is the bourgeois version of virtue-signaling: reading as self-improvement merchandise, a way to stack facts and polish status. Both, for Flaubert, miss the point because they treat literature as a means to something else.
“Read in order to live” turns the hierarchy upside down. Living isn’t what happens after the book has been “useful”; the book is where living gets clarified, intensified, and sometimes made unbearable. The intent is existential rather than moral: reading as a practice that enlarges perception, trains attention, and gives shape to experience that otherwise stays mushy or mute. It’s also an aesthetic manifesto from a novelist obsessed with the exact sentence. If life is chaotic, vulgar, repetitive - the stuff of Madame Bovary’s suffocations - then art is the discipline that makes that chaos legible without pretending it’s tidy.
The subtext is defensive, even a little snobbish: Flaubert protects literature from being reduced to entertainment or sermon. In 19th-century France, the rise of mass literacy and didactic “improving” texts threatened to domesticate the novel into a social instrument. He insists on a third category: reading as a way of being fully awake. Not escape, not homework - oxygen.
“Read in order to live” turns the hierarchy upside down. Living isn’t what happens after the book has been “useful”; the book is where living gets clarified, intensified, and sometimes made unbearable. The intent is existential rather than moral: reading as a practice that enlarges perception, trains attention, and gives shape to experience that otherwise stays mushy or mute. It’s also an aesthetic manifesto from a novelist obsessed with the exact sentence. If life is chaotic, vulgar, repetitive - the stuff of Madame Bovary’s suffocations - then art is the discipline that makes that chaos legible without pretending it’s tidy.
The subtext is defensive, even a little snobbish: Flaubert protects literature from being reduced to entertainment or sermon. In 19th-century France, the rise of mass literacy and didactic “improving” texts threatened to domesticate the novel into a social instrument. He insists on a third category: reading as a way of being fully awake. Not escape, not homework - oxygen.
Quote Details
| Topic | Book |
|---|
More Quotes by Gustave
Add to List
