"Education for all seems to be the product of a type of distributive justice that is in no way related to the individual"

Abdoulaye Wade's quote, "Education for all seems to be the product of a type of distributive justice that is in no chance related to the individual", suggests a complex review of how educational systems are structured and whom they ultimately serve. Wade, a previous president of Senegal, appears to highlight the tension in between the cumulative goal of universal education and the individual needs and abilities of students.

The phrase "education for all" embodies the perfect that everyone must have access to academic opportunities no matter their socio-economic background, geographical location, or other possibly limiting factors. This is a worthy goal rooted in principles of equity and social justice, and it can be viewed as a reflection of a society's commitment to leveling the playing field. However, Wade explains this as a kind of distributive justice-- an allotment of resources meant to benefit all members of society. By utilizing the term "distributive justice", Wade is likely alluding to a design where academic resources are spread out across the population to make sure a standard educational standard is fulfilled for everyone.

The 2nd part of Wade's assertion, "in no chance associated to the person", presents a review. It recommends that while the objective of providing universal education is ostensibly just, it may overlook private needs, preferences, or capacity. The focus may be on attaining harmony instead of acknowledging the varied talents, aspirations, and circumstances of each learner. This might result in a system where education is standardized and homogenized, possibly stifling imagination, vital thinking, and individual growth.

In summary, Wade's observation underscores a prospective drawback in the pursuit of academic equality: the danger of focusing on cumulative goals over individual advancement. It invites a re-examination of how instructional policies can much better accommodate private differences while pursuing inclusivity and fairness.