"Every so often I find some poems that are too good for the readers of The Atlantic because they are a little too involved with the nature of poetry, as such"

Peter Davison's quote addresses a nuanced relationship in between poetry, its inherent nature, and the audience's capacity or disposition to engage with it. At its core, this declaration expresses the delicate balance in between the artistic purity of poetry and its availability to a broader audience.

Davison's reference of poems being "too helpful for the readers of The Atlantic" recommends that particular works possess an intrinsic value or elegance that may not resonate with the publication's normal audience. The "goodness" of these poems is identified not by their mass appeal but by their depth and introspective exploration of "the nature of poetry, as such."

The expression "too included with the nature of poetry" suggests that these poems are deeply reflective, philosophical, or speculative in their structure and styles. They delve into what poetry is, unwinding its layers, examining its kind, function, and essence. Such poems may use intricate language, non-traditional styles, or abstract styles that challenge readers to think deeply about the medium itself, potentially pushing away those seeking immediate psychological or intellectual satisfaction.

Davison discreetly critiques the notion that all poetry should be accessible to be important, recommending that there is benefit in works that push boundaries and elevate the discourse around poetry. He acknowledges a possible gap between high art and popular reception, where particular poems are crafted more for the sake of poetic expedition than for mainstream comprehension.

Ultimately, Davison's quote welcomes readers and poets to think about the role of complexity and self-questioning in poetry. It challenges the idea that ease of access should be the main requirement for a poem's inclusion in a publication. Instead, it promotes for the event of works that, while perhaps daunting to some, contribute substantially to the ongoing conversation about poetry's nature and purpose.