"Force does not constitute right... obedience is due only to legitimate powers"
About this Quote
Rousseau is driving a wedge between power and legitimacy, and he does it with the cool certainty of a man who knows how often the two get confused on purpose. “Force does not constitute right” isn’t a moral platitude; it’s a political booby trap for every regime that treats compliance as consent. If coercion can manufacture “right,” then whoever wins today becomes righteous by default, and politics collapses into a rotating calendar of strongmen. Rousseau refuses that shortcut. He’s not denying that force works; he’s denying that it settles the question that matters.
The second clause sharpens the blade: “obedience is due only to legitimate powers.” “Due” makes obedience sound like a debt, but one that’s payable only under strict conditions. The subtext is almost prosecutorial: citizens don’t owe submission to whoever can hurt them; they owe allegiance to authority that can justify itself. That turns the usual logic of rule inside out. Instead of people needing permission to resist, rulers need permission to command.
Context matters. Writing in the run-up to the revolutions that would shake France and the Atlantic world, Rousseau is intervening in the argument used to sanctify monarchy and empire: stability requires obedience; obedience proves legitimacy. He breaks that loop and replaces it with a contractarian demand for rightful authority rooted in collective agreement, not inherited dominance. It’s a line designed to delegitimize tyranny without romanticizing chaos: if legitimacy is the only source of obligation, then politics becomes the ongoing work of earning consent, not extracting it.
The second clause sharpens the blade: “obedience is due only to legitimate powers.” “Due” makes obedience sound like a debt, but one that’s payable only under strict conditions. The subtext is almost prosecutorial: citizens don’t owe submission to whoever can hurt them; they owe allegiance to authority that can justify itself. That turns the usual logic of rule inside out. Instead of people needing permission to resist, rulers need permission to command.
Context matters. Writing in the run-up to the revolutions that would shake France and the Atlantic world, Rousseau is intervening in the argument used to sanctify monarchy and empire: stability requires obedience; obedience proves legitimacy. He breaks that loop and replaces it with a contractarian demand for rightful authority rooted in collective agreement, not inherited dominance. It’s a line designed to delegitimize tyranny without romanticizing chaos: if legitimacy is the only source of obligation, then politics becomes the ongoing work of earning consent, not extracting it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Jean-Jacques
Add to List











